Showing posts with label guest blogger. Show all posts
Showing posts with label guest blogger. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 23, 2010

Peering behind the curtain with Juliette Wade

I asked Juliette to guest blog about constructing alien languages, because I find it fascinating and thought you would, too.


Sneak Peek at Khachee


Thanks for inviting me, Ann! 




Khachee is the language featured in my latest Analog Science Fiction and Fact story, "At Cross Purposes" (out in bookstores right now!). Let me start by saying that I never design an alien language to require a lesson before reading - so if you don't read this, you should be just fine enjoying the story! However, you can expect a bit of insider knowledge to come from this introduction. I promise not to divulge any spoilers!




Because the aliens in "At Cross Purposes" have a playful side and are easily excited, I designed them on the basis of river otters. This meant I could use all kinds of river-otter-like similes and metaphors in the story, having them compare things to water, to fish, to boats, etc. I also looked for inspiration about river otters' social structure and the sounds they made. These provided major influences for the aliens' language and behavior.




First were the sounds of their language. 

I found recordings of river otter sounds - this one among others - and tried to see if I could imagine extracting consonant-vowel patterns out of it. What I got from all the whistling and clucking was that vowels would be long, that consonants would have a striking quality, and that there would be a tendency to duplicate things. Based on this, the first word I created was the name of the species: Cochee-coco. It has a meaning, which I'll discuss further below.




To make the consonants of Khachee stand out, I decided the language would have a more extensive system of voiceless affricates than English does. Affricates are sounds like "ch." These sounds begin as stops (p/t/k), and then release into fricatives (f/s) at the same location:



  • t->sh = ch

  • t->s= ts



Thus, in addition to "ch," I decided that Khachee would use "ts," "pf," and "kh." To make the contrast with English clear, I decided Khachee wouldn't use plain fricatives at all. A Khachee mispronunciation of the name "Doris" would therefore be "Dorits."




The other thing I picked out from otter life is that they have a small number of young in a litter - usually one to three.




I had independently come up with the idea of a society where people were always born as twins, and therefore this fit well with what I had in mind to do. Cochee-coco are always born in pairs, and while each has a name, they go by the name of the pair. The main characters of "At Cross Purposes" are a brother Chkaa, and a sister Tsee, who go by "ChkaaTsee."


This brings me to the two organizing principles of Cochee-coco social life: Purpose, and Apfaa. I'll have to be a bit vague about Purpose, but I can say that every individual has one - it even becomes part of their name - and it's one of their reasons for being. For this reason, when I named the species, I decided not to have them call themselves "the people" (a common strategy I have used before). The direct translation of Cochee-coco is "Pursue Purpose, pursue-pursue." The name of their language, Khachee, translates as "speak Purpose." Morphologically, it breaks down as follows:

  • chee=purpose
  • co=pursue
  • kha=speak

Obviously, Purpose is something they get very excited about! However, it is a chaotic force in their society because it tends to drive individuals apart. A society based on Purpose wouldn't work without something else to temper it. I therefore set up the opposing force, "apfaa," to rein Purpose in. I actually spent a long time trying to find just the right English word for this, but finally gave up and decided to create one. It's the expression of the twin relationship, established at birth and continued throughout life, and it includes both attraction and repulsion between pair members: "the duality that holds agreement in one hand and conflict in the other."




The presence of these two forces is really important to the language, because Tsee, the alien point-of-view character, constantly judges situations and events around her in terms of either Purpose or apfaa. Apfaa is in fact the basis of the most distinctive feature of Khachee: turn-taking rules. 




English is spoken by individuals. When we speak in conversation, we say what we want to say; then, as we listen to what the other person is saying, we keep our ears alert for natural breaking points. These breaking points are opportunities for us to seize our own turn again. If you've ever felt someone has interrupted you, usually it's because a person began speaking in a place that you didn't recognize as a natural turn-taking break. There's wide variation in what counts as a proper breaking point for turn-taking, even within the usage of English.




Khachee is not spoken by individuals; it's spoken by pairs. Any member of a pair can initiate a statement, question, etc., but the turn is not complete until it has been "chimed" by the other member of the pair. The person "chiming" is responsible for commenting on the quality of the information provided by the initiator. The chimer will indicate whether what has been said is true, or an opinion, or something they overheard, something they want, something they think is horrible, etc. Starting to speak before the second member of the pair has had a chance to chime counts as an interruption. When a Khachee speaker listens to a human speaking, she will tend to assume that the speaker is not finished. This can - and does - lead to awkwardness!




The effect of the Khachee turn-taking strategy for the story's purposes - when it's rendered in English - is a distinctive intonational pattern. This pattern resembles call-and-response, something like what you might have heard in church contexts. I deliberately had to stop myself from including the phrase, "Testify, sister!" because it would have evoked the church context too directly. The turn-taking strategy also influences the way that Khachee speakers organize their own thoughts. They'll tend to express judgments of their own thoughts, acting internally as a pair-member for themselves.


Here are some examples.




A pair turn

Tsee: We won't leave you to speak alone, but will return you to your people.


Chkaa: Truth!




An individual's thought


Pointed at us are weapons, deduced - these aliens are as wary as the Rodhrrrdkhi, suspected.




The last thing I'll mention here is the question of pronouns. When I first imagined the Cochee-coco and their focus on pairs, I toyed with the idea of not using the pronoun "I" at all, but having members of the pair think of themselves as "this half" and "that half." When I tried it, I discovered it was disastrous from a story perspective: it became difficult to track who the alien protagonist was. Pronouns are extremely resistant to change, so watch out for them! In the end, I decided to use a different, more subtle strategy - a strategy of avoidance. Tsee will typically talk about "we," the pair, and won't refer to herself as "I" unless she has to draw a deliberate comparison between her own actions and those of her brother.




I hope you've found this intriguing, possibly useful to your own thoughts on language design, and that you'll take an opportunity to pick up the story to see Khachee in action! Thanks again to Ann for inviting me.


Thursday, May 27, 2010

KS Augustin talks about characterization

It is my pleasure to introduce my first ever guest blogger on SFOO, KS Augustin. Let her entertain you and make you think while finish packing for BayCon. She promised not to trash the place while I'm gone. I don't know. I just might be out of a job when I get back. :)



Firstly, my thanks to Ann for letting me post to her blog.

My husband, J, has a skill I don't have and one I'm terribly envious of. (Forgive the dangling participle, and let's move on.) He reads in three languages: Polish, English and Russian. At the moment, he's reading a Polish anthology of science-fiction from a few years back (it contains an early short story by Jacek Dukaj), and one story in particular both intrigues and repels him.

Now, before I continue, I should explain that J's reading habits are confined to hurried snatches as he plies the ways between two countries on an almost daily basis. In between reading, he has to know where his passport and entry cards are, position himself strategically in the bus, and be ready to fly out the doors and dodge the crowds of meandering tourists as they wander their somnambulist paths from one tour-guided resort to another. Occasionally, he also has to instruct newer Immigration officials on how to process his visa (a most diplomatic process). And he's on a clock. So, he's not what you'd call a relaxed reader.

Currently, he's frustrated. "This story I'm reading is great," he tells me. "The technology is very interesting and the premise is novel. I haven't read a setting like this before. But the characters! There are three main characters, and you can't tell them apart. They're all supposed to do different things, but they're blurring together in my mind. I'm getting very confused. You're a writer. Is it me? Explain this to me."

I love science-fiction. I adore it. I credit my remaining sanity to having science-fiction books available to me while I was growing up. (Living opposite a library didn't hurt either.) But, in my opinion, if there's one area where science-fiction falls down, this is it. Characterisation. When reading characters with similar characteristics it's difficult to tell them apart within stories not just across them. A joke I have that will put you all off side is that George Clooney was perfect to play Kelvin in Lem's Solaris (2002) because both the character in the book, and Clooney, are so wooden.

"This is where romance has it all sewn up," I told my husband. "As a result, being a romance reader as well, I'm completely spoilt. The characters tend to be drawn to such a degree, in such detail, that I only need to be given a fragment -- "a flash of emerald eyes", "the hint of a dimple", "a vase crashing against the wall" -- to know which character did it and what they're probably thinking."

"Ah," he said, "that's what's missing. The technology is there, but I can't get a feel for any of the characters. They're not described, no quirks are outlined. They are just three guys with different names, all interchangeable."

Ann has detailed in a previous post of hers why she prefers male sf writers. And lots of commentators chimed in to come up with female sf authors who don't touch romance. (There was a bit of cheating in that list, as you well know.) I myself have an sf novel currently on submission that doesn't contain any romance, as you'd probably define it. But, boy oh boy, what you learn when you put it in! And that learning keeps on giving, even when you don't focus exclusively on it.

Romance is not merely about the kissing and the sex. Romance is about the psychology of the people involved and how they try to establish connections while the universe is against them. What a lot of sf writers have forgotten, in my opinion, is that you take yourself with the technology. We have PCs and tablets and mobiles and what-have-you. They were all originally meant to be productivity aids. And what have we done with them? We've connected. We've commented. We've hated. We've loved. We've laughed. You are connecting with me right now, drawing conclusions about what kind of person I am, whether you would like the kind of stuff I write, whether you would like *me*, all separate to―and yet an intrinsic co-effect―of the technology that's delivering these words to you. To say that we can have one (the setting) without the other (the human connections) is to live in sterility, where one primate-shaped block can easily be exchanged for another, without any harm coming to the unfolding storyline. Such thinking debases our individual and precious humanity, reducing us all to ciphers.

Romance teaches us that everyone has the potential for intimate connection. Science-fiction teaches us the wonder of what-if. If that isn't one of the most perfect matches ever thought of, I don't know what is.


COMPETITION: I'm giving away two copies of IN ENEMY HANDS at my blog, Fusion Despatches [http://blog.ksaugustin.com]. To be in the drawing, stop by and comment at the Competition post, telling me at which blog you read about my book. You have till 30 June!

Kaz Augustin is a Malaysian-born writer of science-fiction, romance, and permutations of the two. Her website is at www.ksaugustin.com and she blogs at http://blog.ksaugustin.com You can also find her on Facebook and Twitter; just look for "ksaugustin".


vote it up!

Monday, May 17, 2010

The good, the bad and the "Nebulous"

This week I'm guest blogging at Fusion Despatches for author, K.S. Augustin. She'll be guest blogging here the night before BayCon (May 27).

Human nature hasn’t changed much since man discovered fire or Cain killed Abel. People still have the same motivations. Man kills, steals or lies for land and money. The material things we fight over have changed, but the base motivations and plots have not. Our lives have grown more complex because of our possessions, but our motivations at their core are just as simple.

We’ve heard or read all the stories before. There is nothing new. That’s why writers recycle.
Finish reading my entry on Recycling Storylines Well now.

Then come back here for some mostly fantastic SF news.

The Nebula awards were presented this weekend in Cape Canaveral, FL. And many went to my friends! :)


NOVEL
The Windup Girl – Paolo Bacigalupi (Night Shade Books, Sep09)
NOVELLA
The Women of Nell Gwynne’s, the late Kage Baker (Subterranean Press, Jun09)
NOVELLETTE
“Sinner, Baker, Fabulist, Priest; Red Mask, Black Mask, Gentleman, Beast” – Eugie Foster (Interzone, Feb09)
SHORT STORY
“Spar” – Kij Johnson (Clarkesworld, Oct09)
RAY BRADBURY AWARD
“ District 9” Neill Blomkamp and Terri Tatchell (Tri-Star, Aug09)
ANDRE NORTON AWARD
The Girl Who Circumnavigated Fairyland in a Ship of Her Own Making – Catherynne M. Valente (Catherynne M. Valente, Jun09)

Not so good news - ABC cancels Flash Forward. Condolences to Robert J. Sawyer on this one. For those of you who don't know, it's based on his novel of the same name.

Pride and Prejudice and Zombies is going to the big screen with Natalie Portman playing Elizabeth Bennet.

I'm going to experiment with a different blogging schedule. Interviews will go up on Thursdays. And an entry on writing, science fiction, sf news, etc. will go up on Monday or Tuesday. Now that I'm working at home, I can be more flexible. My back is doing great two weeks post surgery. The home office reclamation has begun -- one shelf at a time. Darn! Should have done a before picture. The boys really had it messed up.

vote it up!

Saturday, December 12, 2009

Squeezing out words and slicing words out

I had an interview planned for yesterday that had to get bumped to later, so here I am on Saturday struggling to wrestle more words out of my brain. I just finished a guest blog post for my friend and fellow writer, Sue Bolich on word economy at Words from Thin Air. It was a very timely topic for me since I had just whacked 1100 words off a story last weekend.

I'm also chasing my muse for a good speculative flash fiction idea -- with a deadline looming.

My review of Brian D'Amato's In the Courts of the Sun went up yesterday at MostlyFiction Book Reviews.

I received another ARC today. Joe Haldeman's Starbound. I'm thinking that interview might be better done in person. I'll be seeing Joe in February at RadCon. He's billed as the "Husband of the Fan Guest of Honor." That should be a fun interview.

Next Friday, you can feast your eyes on my interview with Jay Lake.



vote it up!

Tuesday, March 17, 2009

An Interview with SF author, Paula Stiles

It is my privilege to interview a talented up and comer here on Science Fiction and Other ODDysseys. Please meet spec-fic writer, Paula Stiles.



Your list of published works is impressive. In how many markets have you been published?

Thanks! Though I know other people who are far more impressive than me; that's for sure. So far, I've sold 21 stories to 20 markets, and one co-written novel, "Fraterfamilias", with my friend Judith Doloughan, who sadly died last year. I don't even want to try to count the number of nonfiction articles, columns, blogs and whatnot. Those are in the hundreds at this point, probably.

What’s your favorite market? Why?

Hub Magazine from Britain. I've sold two experimental stories to them that nobody else would touch. Also, I actually like reading their fiction. It takes risks without taking itself too seriously. And they do some hysterical, no-holds barred reviews of Brit genre telly. Very different sensibility than what you see in the North American spec-fic markets.

How many stories do you write, on average, per year?

24-6. I shoot for 24, usually end up with a couple more for some special anthology or other that pops up. Plus at least one novel for NaNoWriMo and at least one script for Script Frenzy.

What is the largest number of rejections one of your published stories has had before being sold?

Twenty-two. It had a vampire in it and according to most print-horror short-fiction editors, vampires are passé, even though half the horror section in my local book barn seems loaded with sexy vampire hunters and there are these popular movies like Twilight (God help us) and Let the Right One In, not to mention all the TV shows. But no, vampires are out. Never mind that the vampire in my story was an antagonist and everyone agreed that the protag was highly original. I'll probably be able to sell the book I've written about that protag fairly easily, though.

A friend of mine has had equal trouble selling a historical vampire story and we giggle together over the irony. We've also sworn to leave vampires alone from now on. They just don't sell. Not in short fiction, anyway.

How many stories do you have out making the rounds at markets right now?

43 stories and 1 book. And I have a spec script that I have to send back out.

What has been your biggest publishing triumph?

Oh, the Writers of the Future sale, "Snakes and Ladders", definitely. I made the most money on that one and probably got the most publicity. It really is the big deal they say it is, though no one sale will ever make or break you.

How many hours do you spend writing per week? Do you have a daily BIC (but in chair) quota you hold yourself to?

You know, that's a really tough question--I'm not sure. At the moment, I often spend a lot of time in front of the computer, ten or twelve hours in a day and I don't really take days off--I just have days where I get more done and days where I get less done. Or maybe I decided to go down to the beach to clear my head and catch a swim, or go see a movie with a buddy, or go out to dinner, or something. I'm with Stephen King on this one. I write on big holidays and then lie about it because, you know, it's what I want to be doing. Nobody's got a gun to my head here. So, I'll pretend I didn't write when I did.

People think you're sad when you spend a holiday writing stories and I'm like, 'No, this is my passion.' It so happens that I'm good enough at this that I like to do it all the time and somebody actually pays me for that sometimes. But you know, if it weren't for the fact that the rent has to get paid, too, I would do it for free. I actually have to make myself stop at the end of each day and go to bed.

But a lot of my computer time is business stuff like email or promotion or just plain goofing off. For example, I just spent the past week or so heavily promoting this new Mythos 'zine/faux newspaper my friend Silvia Moreno-Garcia and I are putting out called Innsmouth Free Press. I've been setting up pages on MySpace, Facebook, Livejournal and now, I've got addicted to Twitter, as if jonesing for Supernatural wank on IMDB wasn't bad enough. Man, that Socksamillion cat blog is like cybercrack, though I have to say that Twitter is amazingly good for setting up a fast promotion.

People tell me about how high my production is and how efficient and a hard worker I am and you know, I don't see it. I really think I'm a pretty lazy sod. I've never been a particularly fast worker, either. I like to see which way the chips are falling before I choose where to roll. I don't type particularly fast and if I can do something in a thousand words that others would do in twice that, I will. Cut out extra words? Why write them in the first place?

So, I'm very efficient in that way. I dislike make-work writing with a passion. Life is so short and I have a list of things a mile long that I won't ever get to, let alone the stuff I still intend to do. I'm not going to waste what time I've got on the pointless stuff if I can possibly help it.

But I really have to trick myself into writing--play music, watch a DVD or tape that has a character who works for what I need, look up some fact, this or that. I know that sounds odd, but I have to get myself into a mood or set a deadline (more often) and just grind it out. Weirdly enough, I'm cursing the process and hating it about 70% of the time I write, yet I'm still glad I did it afterward. And I actually seem to write better when I just grind it out, telling myself the entire time, "This is poo! Utter poo!" and doing it anyway. There's some weird connection to my subconscious that happens and all sorts of original monsters sneak out into what I'm convinced at the time is utterly pedestrian. I read it a few weeks or months later and I'm thinking, "Who wrote that?! Sure wasn't me!"

In the end, I think I end up actually writing maybe twenty hours per week after all the futzing around, but I need that extra time to get settled into it, even if I spend that time working some job for someone else. I'm efficient that way, too, multitasking.

What are your favorite themes?

Madness; revenge; outsiders; deadpan and apparently ordinary heroes dealing with bad situations and stupid people with equal snark; black humor (the blacker the better); the id; cross-cultural issues; contact with the mysterious, with the divine. Actually, I'm kind of obsessed with different cultures and different languages. I get really sick and tired of the same old white, Anglophone, straight, western cultures you see again and again, especially in hard SF.

I also like to pair up men and women a lot, though not always romantically, and have about gender parity on protags. You stick a man and a woman together in a situation and it sparks things off right away. We're a bit alien to each other as it is, so there's always a potential for conflict, misunderstandings...it's just a different thing than if you have two people of the same gender. And I also do a lot of cross-generational stuff. Again, more potential for spark, for conflict I guess, there.

I like to write a lot about the divine in the world. It's annoying because if you want to do that, you usually can't sell it. The only people who might want it are the Christian spec-fic mags and they don't exactly want a story that takes pagan beliefs seriously, for example, instead of as just a backdrop or deus ex machina for your fantasy story....Everybody else wants a secular viewpoint, ignoring the fact that "secular" is all about western JudaeoChristian values, but with God and angels replaced by "aliens" or "highly-evolved humans" and all the magic and mystery sucked out of the world. Yee ha. No.

From what sources do you draw most of your inspiration?

Probably the three biggies are music, non-fiction history or science books and movies/TV shows. You would not believe the number of films that had a great premise and screwed it up where I've merrily stolen that one good idea and done my own take on it. And apparently, my worldview in my writing is so eccentric that it's too different from the source material for anyone to ever notice.

But I also draw my ideas from art--I love Native and cave art and have a lot of it on my walls. I also have a collection of unusual stones--fossils, ocean jasper, quartz, things like that. For some reason, looking at and feeling the odd patterns can get me going whenever I'm stuck.

I also structure my writing year around writing challenges--Short Story in a Week with Other Worlds Writers Workshop, Script Frenzy, NaNoWriMo, those things. And I have my own revision challenges and deadlines. I find deadlines strangely inspiring. They give things a much-needed structure and urgency: "Oh, that needs to be done now."

What writers have influenced your love of SF and your writing?

Robert Heinlein, Lois McMaster Bujold, Stephen King, Herman Melville, H.P. Lovecraft, Will Shakespeare, Joanna Russ, Ursula K. Le Guin, Nalo Hopkinson. Those kinds of folks.

What are you working on now?

The second week of SSIAW [short story in a week](I finished three stories for week one), a textbook that's due in May, some book reviews, and a column for Fantasy Magazine on why Dean Winchester is going dark in Supernatural. I anticipate some fan-screams over the latter. For a character who is deliberately portrayed both by the writers and the actor as unstable and seriously edgy, he sure has a lot of fans who are dedicated to whitewashing him and making him look like a pussycat. A big man-eating pussycat, maybe. I dunno...

Has social networking helped with branding yourself?

Oh, yeah. Look, social networking is just free promotion. And you need that these days. Promotion used to be really expensive. That was before the internet and before publishers basically decided they weren't going to pay to promote their writers anymore. Now, a lot of publishers expect their writers to promote them. So, being able to do it for free is a real godsend for us writers and small-press publishers/editors.

Also, it helps you get to know fans and fellow writers and editors and such. The active spec-fic writing community, even the overall professional writing community, is really quite small. I reckon it's like any other artistic community--actors or scriptwriters in Hollywood or Vancouver, for example. Everybody either knows or becomes aware of each other after a while.

It's also helpful in dealing with fans. I don't think this strict divide between "celebrities" and fans as if we're two different species is very healthy. I have several friends who basically "found" me because of my work. So, I don't get these writers who moan about their fans. I'm sufficiently obscure that I can field those who track me down pretty easily. My life is much richer for meeting fans of my work, not least because everybody seems to have a different favorite story and doesn't like every single thing I write. I figure that means I must be writing a good spread of different stuff.

Have online writing groups helped you?

Oh, sure. I think they're very useful as long as they're well-managed. The poorly-managed ones can become snakepits. I'm currently involved with OWWW for the past six years and The Pit at Permuted Press for a year and a half.

Do you also have beta readers or face to face groups you attend?

I have some friends I exchange stuff with by email. Not face to face, though. Even with my RL friends, we exchange things by email. Much easier than hard copy.

What advice can you give a novice writer?

Keep writing, revising and sending things out there. Have a plan with what markets you submit to (don't expect to sell to them on the first try, though it can happen). When you write something, don't polish it forever. Finish the piece, revise it, send it out the door. Don't mess about.

Be careful whom you insult. Metawank over big issues in the community can be lots of fun, but not when you're making enemies. On the other hand, there's a little thing called "free speech" that most of us have in our respective countries. You're entitled to that. Just choose your battles carefully. And never send a hostile reply to a rejection note. Unless the editor wants a rewrite or to otherwise continue the conversation, your only reply to a rejection should be another sub sent according to the market's guidelines.

We’ve all heard this response from time to time when we tell people we write SF: Oh, science fiction. I used to read that a lot when I was a kid.” What’s your response?

A shrug and, "Yeah, I get that a lot." To quote Tim Roth in "Lie to Me".

Okay, so their tastes changed; they don't like SF anymore now that they can drink legally and vote. And I think most romantic comedies are stupid. My idea of a chick flick is Aliens or Terminator 2 because they both have tough female protags. So? I just don't see why it matters to your average Joe that I like SF. Different strokes for different folks.

I grew up when it definitely wasn't cool to be an SF fan, let alone a female one. I'd read and write spec-fic from an early age and my teachers would look at me as if I'd grown five heads. Didn't help that I was seven grades ahead in language arts from second grade onward. I've grown impatient with this idea some people have that their opinion matters in what I choose to read or watch. Sure, I love to share fiction with others. I think that fiction is a shared experience--hence the existence of fan groups in the first place. But I don't respect anyone who thinks it's appropriate to put down someone else just because they like rocket ships or superheroes or saltgunning ghosthunters, or whatnot.

Do you have a day job? Do you find it hard to balance work, family and writing?

My day job is basically freelancing at the moment. Has been for a wee while. It's hard because freelancing to get by requires a lot of work, so even when you're not writing, you're thinking about it. But I do try to stay in touch and respect the people in my life. And when I don't, they bang down my door. They know me. I've disappeared into the African bush or somewhere in Spain on some research trip for extended periods of time without a second thought. I'm very self-sufficient and if people don't want me around, I'll just go off and do my own thing. So, between that and me being rather shy in real life, I tend to have people seek me out rather than the other way around. I don't like to bother people. I kind of have to be invited to do that. It's something I have to work on. We're all ongoing projects.

What do you enjoy doing when you’re not writing?

Reading, travel, music, going to movies and dinner with friends, animals. Right now, I have two cats. Would have dogs and a horse again if I could. I've been to Africa, Europe, all over North America. I like to see new places and try new things, even if it's just walking around the neighborhood. I like to walk a lot. I love swimming, especially in the ocean. If I had some money, I'd get another horse and recertify in diving. And get a telescope. I've been an astronomy buff since childhood. I also love history, archaeology and paleontology. I love aquariums, museums and zoos and have worked at all three.

And I like watching television. Didn't have one growing up and various other times, so I'm not one of those people who worry about it rotting their brain. It's a cheap form of entertainment and there's a lot of experimentation going on right now, especially on cable and in Britain and Canada.

What’s your ultimate dream for your writing career?

I'd like to make a decent living at it where I was writing mostly fiction or nonfiction about fiction and history. But with time to do other stuff.

Thanks so much for taking the time to share some insights with my readers.

Now, dear readers, hustle on over to my LJ blog, Science Fiction and All Things Lavrattian, where Paula is guest blogging on the topic: writer collaboration.

Tuesday, January 20, 2009

Book review and guest blogger, Sue Lange

My review of the Promise of Wolves by Dorothy Hearst is up at Mostly Fiction. It was a great book. Now I'm reading a mystery, Tahoe Avalanche by Todd Borg.

I've decided that I'm really mostly a SF gal. There's a lot of fantasy stuff that I just can't get into. So, I just started but didn't finish one. I won't tell you what it was because it wasn't the author. It was me. It's just not my cup of tea. And then the next book on my TBR shelf was yet another fantasy book. It's been too long since I read a good SF. I have plenty waiting in the wings.

I'm reading the mystery first as I promised to review it. I'm enjoying though, so far. The only reason I don't read mysteries is I'm afraid I'll like them too much. ;)

Mind you there's some fantasy I love. Promise of the Wolves is fantasy. And I'm crazy for the Thursday Next novels by Jasper Fforde. I'm just more picky with it than I am with SF.

I'd like to invite everyone to visit my other blog, Science Fiction Matters: and all things Lavrattian this week. My friend from Broad Universe, Sue Lange is guest blogger.